Purchase Order Processing (POP)

We use transaction analysis codes quite extensively due to having multiple sites. Currently we can only add these at the point of invoice entry which can cause omissions, we would like the ability to add them to POs

When confirming goods have been received it only shows the stock code. It would be useful to show a stock description so it's clear exactly what is on each line (As in Sage 50).

There currently is a way of configuring Sage with Outlook so that you can get email notifications when a requisition has been raised and is ready to be authorised and vice versa. However, the part of the Microsoft Licence that you need to get this...

The system would benefit from the ability to have ‘blanket orders’. This is common in Education for Agency Staff where an agency staff member would have an order for a large amount put on – say £5,000. And then weekly invoices would be matched off...

There is currently no option to select an alternative purchase order layout at the point of printing. We are having to change the POP layout in settings, print the order, then restore these to the default layout. When printing a sales invoice ther...

When we currently add a project analysis code to an authorised purchase order, it requires authorisation again. As no values or products are amended, it is purely the addition of analysis information, is it not possible to retain the authorised st...

Please could the item descriptions from purchase orders be shown in purchase invoice postings in the nominal ledger and budget statements? At present, unless we manually type in additional narratives there is scant detail in the nominal ledger and...

When posting a PO invoice currently there isone line created for each nominal code used with a reference of PI and then the supplier account number. We would like an option for this to default to a separate nominaltransaction for each line where t...

When cancelling a purchase order or lines within it there is no option to record a reason why. This would be helpful to refer back to if there are future queries.

For audit requirements it would be great if we could run an audit report which shows everyone in the system who has approved an order, where multiple people are involved. (and not the last person as is currently the case)